Re: Re: Re: [Chicken-users] performance issue in xml-rpc

[felix winkelmann]

On 12/15/06, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sure.
> Are you going to add unread-string in port class? Or exposing the buffer?

No, but I've pushed a few changes to the darcs head that add special
handling of read-line for tcp and string ports. No big improvement, here,
though. Please have a look.

> The performance is improved just a little bit, but better than nothing.
> The arguments are always ports, and code for Gambit has the same syntax.
> And,I got no error with my simple xml-rpc test.
> I can commit the patch if you or anyone responsible wants.

Yes, please commit it.


cheers,
felix