Re: Re: Re: [Chicken-users] performance issue in xml-rpc

[felix winkelmann]

On 12/18/06, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 12/18/06, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 12/15/06, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sure.
> > > Are you going to add unread-string in port class? Or exposing the buffer?
> > >
> >
> > No, but I've pushed a few changes to the darcs head that add special
> > handling of read-line for tcp and string ports. No big improvement, here,
> > though. Please have a look.
>
> So, you added read-line to the port class.

Exactly.

> When it is ready for testing, just let me know please.

Ready for testing.

> > > The performance is improved just a little bit, but better than nothing.
> > > The arguments are always ports, and code for Gambit has the same syntax.
> > > And,I got no error with my simple xml-rpc test.
> > > I can commit the patch if you or anyone responsible wants.
> >
> > Yes, please commit it.
>
> Did it.

Thanks.


cheers,
felix