Re: [Chicken-users] Date/time problem (my code I am sure)

[Jeremy Cowgar]

Quoting Kon Lovett <address@hidden>:
>
> Only difference. 'vector->date' & 'to-time' are the same. I also  
> tried using '(define vec1 (vector 2006 12 21))' since your test was  
> probably on the same day - result is
> -59574 which is again sensible.
> 
> And I doubt it is your code since w/ the same test we get wildly  
> different results. I notice '675162109' is a reasonable value for  
> nanoseconds, but I can't see how 'time-second' could be returning the  
> wrong field.
> 
> How about the numbers egg, 1.1 is the latest. (I am reaching here.)

numbers     Version: 1.1 (Release 200610211943)
srfi-19     Version: 2.3 (Release 200612190544)
srfi-19-io  Version: 2.3 200610211943)

Hm. Bummer it's not my code, it's a whole lot easier to fix :-D

Jeremy