[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO
From: |
Peter Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:40:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi!
> I don't
> see any technical risk in fiddling with Darcs --> Subversion mirroring,
> even if it doesn't fit my social agenda.
Exactly! In fact, I don't even like Subversion's centralised development
model. But it is a fact that many people love and use Subversion. And
the idea of letting developers use whatever they like most is appealing.
Tailor was just a suggestion. It has been on my todo list for quite a
while, but so far I haven't had the time to give it a try.
But I agree that either the Subversion support should be real support
(even if it is read-only) or be dropped at all.
Groetjes,
Peter.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, Peter Busser, 2007/01/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, felix winkelmann, 2007/01/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, Brandon J. Van Every, 2007/01/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, minh thu, 2007/01/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, Brandon J. Van Every, 2007/01/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, Peter Bex, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, felix winkelmann, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, Brandon J. Van Every, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, Peter Bex, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO, Brandon J. Van Every, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO,
Peter Busser <=
Re: [Chicken-users] building on windows, felix winkelmann, 2007/01/07