[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process.
From: |
Robin Lee Powell |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process. |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:32:29 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
In the middle of the Scheme binding I wrote for mooix, I call
process (from posix) for IPC. The system is, in total, very
complex; so much so that I don't even know where to start to at
making a pared-down example.
So, I'll describe the behaviour.
I run process in the same way (see
http://paste.lisp.org/display/35085 for my code; at least, that's
what it looked like after I had hacked it for a while trying to
solve this problem) quite a number of times. At one point, process
calls a Perl script that is set sticky (not that I think that
matters, but there you are) that returns no output at all. process
correctly sees it as returning no output. The *next* call to
process appends a string, call it StringX, to the real output of the
process it calls, for no apparent reason.
StringX happens to be the mooix-internal name of the object whose
mooix method was the Perl script I mentioned. I have no idea where
it's coming from in this interaction; it's not passed through
process at any point that I can see.
The really wierd part:
This only happens if the second argument to process is filled. I
was filling it with (list "") just to avoid calling the shell
(security warm-fuzzies). But now I've had to take that out, so this
will work.
This may very well *not* be a Chicken issue: as I said, the system
is very complex and, in particular, hacks a number of libc calls,
including exec*.
However, I've never seen this behaviour before, using either C or
Perl code in mooix, so... *shrug*
Any help/suggestions/things to try welcome, although I do have a
workaround.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
- [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process.,
Robin Lee Powell <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., Kon Lovett, 2007/01/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., Robin Lee Powell, 2007/01/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., felix winkelmann, 2007/01/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., Robin Lee Powell, 2007/01/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., felix winkelmann, 2007/01/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., Unknown, 2007/01/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., Robin Lee Powell, 2007/01/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., Graham Fawcett, 2007/01/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., felix winkelmann, 2007/01/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd behaviour of process., Graham Fawcett, 2007/01/15