Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg

[Arto Bendiken]

On 2/9/07, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> I see. I understand that the structure doesn't have a parent pointer,
> but I'm not sure if this feature can be wrapped on top of the current things.

I simply meant that you can use (define-record) to wrap your own
structure around the environment structure, and include a parent
pointer (and any other needed goodies) in that.

> (I take "easily" as the possibility of coding in an interpreter only
> with standard procedures.)

Well, I'm building an interpreter with first-class macros and
namespaces, so hopefully the structure is flexible enough :-)

--
Arto Bendiken | address@hidden | http://bendiken.net/