Re: [Chicken-users] opengl egg naming scheme

[Kon Lovett]

On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:53 AM, minh thu wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At the beginning of my journey with Chicken, I stolen the opengl egg
> and repacked it: I changed its naming gl:UpperCase in glAsInC.
>
> Now I have code I'd like to share that depends on the glAsInC naming.
> It would not be very difficult for me to change it but I find it ugly.
>
> Is there any rationale to keep/change the extant egg ? To provide a  
> new one ?
>
> Or is it possible to use the extant egg (the one with gl:Naming) but
> use it as if it was named glLikeThis ?

(define glAsInC gl:UpperCase)

Felix's naming for the glut & opengl eggs is a little odd in that he  
follows the C binding CamlCase style - not the Scheme way, especially  
since Scheme, up thru R5RS, is case-insensitive.

(See http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention)

Best Wishes,
Kon

> Thanks,
> thu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users