Re : [Chicken-users] opengl egg naming scheme

[minh thu]

2007/2/27, Kon Lovett <address@hidden>:
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:53 AM, minh thu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > At the beginning of my journey with Chicken, I stolen the opengl egg
> > and repacked it: I changed its naming gl:UpperCase in glAsInC.
> >
> > Now I have code I'd like to share that depends on the glAsInC naming.
> > It would not be very difficult for me to change it but I find it ugly.
> >
> > Is there any rationale to keep/change the extant egg ? To provide a
> > new one ?
> >
> > Or is it possible to use the extant egg (the one with gl:Naming) but
> > use it as if it was named glLikeThis ?
>
> (define glAsInC gl:UpperCase)

Ouch, that's a lot of defines :)
Thanks
thu

> Felix's naming for the glut & opengl eggs is a little odd in that he
> follows the C binding CamlCase style - not the Scheme way, especially
> since Scheme, up thru R5RS, is case-insensitive.
>
> (See http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention)
>
> Best Wishes,
> Kon
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > thu
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicken-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users