Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : [Chicken-users] Scheme (LISP) editing

[Kon Lovett]

On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:34 AM, minh thu wrote:

> > The tricky part is that since this is an editor, it has to be  
> > line, and
> > also, s-exp oriented. Sometimes those might conflict in  
> > interesting ways,
> > especially in terms of incomplete forms or just non-scheme code.
>
> ... and add new forms along the line of (comment ...), ...

Err, then wouldn't you need a form like (source ...) to distinguish a  
source form of '(comment ...)' from a (comment ...)? i.e., the  
internal form is would be some kind of syntax tree.

Best Wishes,
Kon