|
From: | Dan Muresan |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] memcached |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:19:27 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070509 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 |
Ok, so that's one vote for separate 'memcached' and 'cache' eggs.
I would vote against a generically-named cache egg... There are many types of caches (depending on storage medium, indexing, time complexities of caching/retrieval, expiration strategies etc)
Best, Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |