chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Seed thought: perl/ruby dbi equivalent for scheme/ch


From: Elf
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Seed thought: perl/ruby dbi equivalent for scheme/chicken?
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:11:17 -0700 (PDT)


it might be beneficial to review oleg's site... he has a lot of good stuff
on db interfaces and abstraction in scheme. (and iirc, has one or more
pure scheme relational db implementations available.)

-elf


On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Matthew Welland wrote:

First off, my heartfelt thanks to the mysql, sqlite(3) and postgresql egg
authors. Without the sqlite3 and postgresql eggs I would be stuck on ruby
or perl. Thank you!

Perl, Ruby and Bigloo have available a single SQL interface for accessing
SQL db's. It is called DBI in Perl and Ruby and the RDBMS library for
Bigloo. The documentation for the Bigloo interface can be found here:

http://bigloo-lib.sourceforge.net/bigloo-lib_6.html

Has a similar approach for chicken been discussed or worked on? I was
thinking of building a primitive wrapper to achieve something like this. My
thought was to choose a subset of the sqlite3 api (my favorite) and
implement wrappers to postgresql (and perhaps one day mysql). I'm stopped
by the lack of calling with placeholders in the existing postgresql driver.
Parsing the queries to implement:

(sqlite3:exec (db <sqlite3:database>) (sql <string>) . params)

Where the sql includes simple parameters such as:

(sqlite3:exec db "INSERT INTO foo(name,address) VALUES(?,?)" "bob" "NY")

Would be fairly easy but would that be enough to cover most usage or would
this break down quickly? Does anyone else see such a wrapper as being
useful?

Thanks,

Matt





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]