Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology

[felix winkelmann]

On 8/23/07, Arto Bendiken <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I believe this is simply a case of a situation where more of the
> generally useful stuff should be pushed down to Chicken's standard
> library, whence all eggs could rely on that functionality always being
> available (unless compiled out e.g. when installing a very minimal
> Chicken).

Valid point.

>
> Of course, I've no idea if this really is what Felix wants to do with
> Chicken. But it's at least an opportune time to be asking these kinds
> of questions, given the R6RS situation.

I? I don't know anything. I'm just trying not to go under and to keep things
working, somehow. I don't have the time for things like plans... :-)


cheers,
felix