Re: [Chicken-users] Syntax-case question

[felix winkelmann]

On 10/12/07, William Ramsay <address@hidden> wrote:
> They are at the top level in  this case, but they are in outer binding
> forms in other parts of the porogram.
>

Syntax-case is, as I said, more restrictive about the placement of definitions,
so for example,

(let ()
  (...something not a definition...)
  (define ...)
  ...)

is illegal with syntax-case: definitions inside bodies may not be
preceded by non-definitions (according to R5RS).


cheers,
felix