Re: [Chicken-users] RFC: web-unity egg

[Daishi Kato]

I see. I didn't realize that part is used.
That said, you are using only a small part of Spiffy, right?
I think I should use the Spiffy backend in any case, though.
--daishi

On 10/29/07, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:04:47AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > Soulds really cool!
> >
> > One question is why its backend is spiffy, and not http-server.
> > Is it possible to have an additional backend for http-server?
> >
> > --daishi
>
> You could certainly write one, but it would be a bit more work because Spiffy
> already takes care of tracing a path to the requested script and generates
> PATHINFO.  It would be wasteful to duplicate that algorithm in web-unity for
> Spiffy.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
> --
> http://sjamaan.ath.cx
> --
> "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
>  is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
>  and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
>  experience much like composing poetry or music."
>                                                         -- Donald Knuth
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>
>
>