[Chicken-users] Re: SRFI-27 "inconsistency"

[Kon Lovett]

On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:09 AM, John Cowan wrote:

> Terrence Brannon scripsit:
>
> > I dont know why things like SRFI-27 get ratified and have the
> > inconsistency that Kon discusses in the "Issues" section of his docs:
> > http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/srfi-27.html

There is no "inconsistency" in the SRFI. The comment in the issues  
section is just that, a comment.

Best Wishes,
Kon