Re: [Chicken-users] chicken bug?

[felix winkelmann]

On Nov 5, 2007 4:30 AM, naruto canada <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Ok, I don't know what to make of this. One thing I noticed was that
> "row-reduce" should never have been called. This example don't use
> row-reduce.

I assume you are calling a continuation with zero return values, probably in a
non-values context. This is according to R5RS not defined, and in chicken
works most of the times, but not always, depending on context.

To see a longer backtrace, invoke csi with "-:a256", for example.


cheers,
felix