[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files)
From: |
Siegfried Gonzi |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files) |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:10:12 +0100 |
Sorry I tried it that -check-imports: but jonestly: I want a line number or at
least the function where the problem occurs. I mean a 1000 line program please
do not ask me to use Emacs for searching the hot-spot then because I only know
some basic Emacs commands.
Hey, why is it hard for the compiler to tell me the line number?
I cannot remember how Bigloo dealt with that kind of things because it is been
3 months ago when I last used Bigloo (I cannot install it on my Leopard). But
not that bad I think otherwise I would like to remember.
But this is a totally different experience for me that kind with runtime
errors. I know this from IDL.
Anyone here who has ever developed 2000 lines of Chicken code?
Btw: Cicken is also fast on micro benchmark. When doing the matrix-matrix on
512 arrays and not 2048 though C is 2 times faster now than Chicken but still
Chicken is blazingly fast on this.
Regards, Siegfried
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:54:44 +0100
> Von: Thomas Christian Chust <address@hidden>
> Scheme variables may be defined at runtime so it is not an error for a
> symbol to be unbound at compile time. You can, however, tell the CHICKEN
> compiler to emit warnings for undefined symbols and redefined imported
> symbols using the -check-imports command line switch.
>
> cu,
> Thomas
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), Zbigniew, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), John Cowan, 2007/12/18
- [Chicken-users] Installing Octave Egg, Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Installing Octave Egg, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Installing Octave Egg, Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Installing Octave Egg, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Installing Octave Egg, Pierre-Alexandre Fournier, 2007/12/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), Thomas Christian Chust, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files),
Siegfried Gonzi <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), Will Farr, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Postscript: (Reading binary files), Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/18
- [Chicken-users] Strange observation: Chicken, C, C++: Joe Average does benchmarking, Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/18
- [Chicken-users] Re: Strange observation: Chicken, C, C++: Joe Average does benchmarking, Zbigniew, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Strange observation: Chicken, C, C++: Joe Average does benchmarking, Alex Queiroz, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Strange observation: Chicken, C, C++: Joe Average does benchmarking, Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Strange observation: Chicken, C, C++: Joe Average does benchmarking, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/19
- [Chicken-users] Question SRFI-56, Siegfried Gonzi, 2007/12/20
- [Chicken-users] Re: Question SRFI-56, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/20
- [Chicken-users] Re: Question SRFI-56, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/20