chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions


From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:30:17 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Elf scripsit:

> i take the number of srfi's relating to binding (values ...) clauses in 
> different ways as evidence of its confusing and unnecessary nature. :)

Whereas I think of TMTOWTDI as one of Scheme's virtues.  Anyhow, we've
come a long way from being required to use call-values.  It also occurs
to me that rec and let-values and all need not expand into call-values --
that's just the *portable* expansion of them.

-- 
Her he asked if O'Hare Doctor tidings sent from far     John Cowan
coast and she with grameful sigh him answered that      http://ccil.org/~cowan
O'Hare Doctor in heaven was. Sad was the man that word  address@hidden
to hear that him so heavied in bowels ruthful. All
she there told him, ruing death for friend so young,    James Joyce, Ulysses
algate sore unwilling God's rightwiseness to withsay.   "Oxen of the Sun"




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]