[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] multiple values in chicken
From: |
Zbigniew |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] multiple values in chicken |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:24:49 -0600 |
Thanks Shawn. Your results are really similar to Ivan's Xeon, which was
running 64-bit. You both had a huge number of major GCs, in the 6-7k
range. I believe that you are seeing not only the effect of the stack frame
difference we're seeing on certain 32-bit systems, but also the double
word size of 64-bit machines.
If you were to rerun your binary with a double-size stack (256k) to
account for the 64-bit words, I bet your GCs would go down substantially.
Try:
$ ./shinn -:s256k
On 2/1/08, Shawn W. <address@hidden> wrote:
> Results on my not-quite-2GHZ C2D follow, substantially different from
> Ivan's. Mine is
> using 64-bit mode, his 32-bit.
> 37.201 seconds elapsed
> 14.123 seconds in (major) GC
> 6112 major GCs
Re: [Chicken-users] multiple values in chicken, Zbigniew, 2008/02/01
Re: [Chicken-users] multiple values in chicken, F. Wittenberger, 2008/02/01
Re: [Chicken-users] multiple values in chicken, John Cowan, 2008/02/01