Re: [Chicken-users] opengl egg does not appear to compile under Chicken 3.0.0

[felix winkelmann]

On Feb 5, 2008 9:28 AM, Drake Wilson <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I now have Chicken with DEBUGBUILD=1 running in a GDB trying to
> compile gl.scm with the same command line chicken-setup's csc
> invocation said it was using before.  It bombs with SEGV.  I could
> show the whole backtrace, but given the way Chicken uses C calls I'm
> not sure it'd be helpful... is there something specific I should be
> doing in this case?  I see a couple of references on chicken-hackers,
> but nothing that I can decipher; I also see a reference to gdb.egg
> < http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg04747.html >,
> but that appears to be for some other purpose.
>
> The top stackframe shows:
>
> #0  0x0000000000482398 in f_10980 (c=2, t0=140735375900672, t1=6) at 
> compiler.c:5429
> 5429    if(C_truep((C_word)C_lambdainfop(((C_word*)t0)[5]))){
>
> There's about five hundred other opaque-looking stackframes, and then
>
> #502 0x00002b8728bb323a in tr2 (k=0x2b8728c4b5a6 <f_4232>) at library.c:6067
> #503 0x00002b8728ecde35 in CHICKEN_run (toplevel=0x0) at runtime.c:1345
> #504 0x00002b8728ecbac3 in CHICKEN_main (argc=17, argv=0x7fff821765b8, 
> toplevel=0x404539) at runtime.c:564
> #505 0x00000000004044fe in main (argc=17, argv=0x7fff821765b8) at 
> chicken.c:1929
>
> which I don't expect to be that helpful.
>
> GDB appears to be refusing to load the header files containing any of
> these macros (for reasons which I do not know---it found the
> compiler.c source file just fine), meaning that trying to evaluate the
> pieces of that statement to pick it apart would be an exercise in pain
> at the moment.  Should I try to get GDB to behave on that front, or is
> that barking up the wrong tree?
>

Sorry for the late reply. I'm currently at a loss trying to figure out
what's wrong here. I will try this on out 64-bit machine when I find
some time.


cheers,
felix