Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation

[Peter Bex]

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:42:00AM -0800, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
> I think this wouldn't be very hard to do, since they would all behave
> pretty much in the same way.  We can probably just keep a list with
> them (ie. '(string class method)) that we add to as needed.
> 
> That is, I think you're assuming that adding new ones is hard, and I'm
> just letting you know that nah, once everything is in place, it would
> be rather easy. :-)
> 
> So I'll add support for <string>, <class> and <method>.
> 
> Does that sound good to you?

I'm losing sight of the changes a bit.  Could you please update the
wiki-syntax doc so we have something to work with for the hackathon?

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth

pgp8DDGJWnvPw.pgp
Description: PGP signature