Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation

[Graham Fawcett]

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<address@hidden> wrote:
> > Is that possible, given that reading the Scheme file may require
>  > custom syntax?
>
>  It may not be possible to do it reliably, but if we get just 50% of
>  the cases right, that's an improvement.  I suspect with some lovin' we
>  should be able to get 90% or so.  :-)

I agree, love is the answer. ;-)

Some day, we might want to offer an alternate way of marking which
procs should be indexed, or providing a formal exports list, like the
(declare ) form but for interpreted files as well. That would cover
the cases where automated indexing is intractable. But yes, 50% is a
good target for a first attempt.

Graham