Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home

[Graham Fawcett]

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I hereby humbly propose the removal of key-on from the combinators egg
>  on the basis that it is entirely redundant with cmp-key in the orders
>  egg, except for the fact that the documentation for the orders egg
>  needs a bit of love and care.

If redundancy were a reason for deleting egg functionality, we have
about seven object systems to get rid of. ;-)

I don't mind, Alejo. I've started documenting the orders egg as an act
of good faith.

Graham