[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] DBI
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] DBI |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:11:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:27:36PM -0800, Vincent Manis wrote:
> On 2008 Feb 27, at 13:27, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> > At the driver level, LOBs are often handled with a stream-based
> > interface. For an LOB, I'd suggest representing it with a a thunk
> > which, when evaluated, returns an input stream, Chicken blob or a
> > string. That would allow you to inspect the other column values before
> > deciding whether to evaluate the LOB.
>
>
> +1. -- vincent
I assume with "input stream" you mean "input port"? (With "stream", I
think of SRFI-40/41)
In that case, +1.
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgpgyI2WaEqZl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Chicken-users] New immediate values (was: DBI), (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] New immediate values (was: DBI), Thomas Chust, 2008/02/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] New immediate values (was: DBI), John Cowan, 2008/02/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, felix winkelmann, 2008/02/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Tobia Conforto, 2008/02/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Vincent Manis, 2008/02/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Peter Bex, 2008/02/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Peter Bex, 2008/02/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Ozzi Lee, 2008/02/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2008/02/28
Re: [Chicken-users] DBI, Vincent Manis, 2008/02/27
Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), Ozzi, 2008/02/27