chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)


From: Graham Fawcett
Subject: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:27:20 -0500

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Ozzi <address@hidden> wrote:
>  > How is (sql-null?) harder or less intuitive?
>  It's not harder, but not being able to use null? to test for NULL is
>  counterintuitive in my eyes.

I know what you're saying. I guess I just like to keep my different
types of nulls in different baskets.

>  Count me as on the fence I guess, between null void and sql-null.

Sitting on the fence between null and void sounds like a scary place to be. :-)

Graham

The Tao that can be tested
for equality with the Tao
is not the true Tao.
-- Chuang Tzu (paraphrased)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]