[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for nul
From: |
Shawn Rutledge |
Subject: |
Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)) |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:49:59 -0700 |
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Graham Fawcett <address@hidden> wrote:
> Fortunately, Chicken Literary and his friends visited the fox, Henry
> Baker, who reminded them that their stacks are GC'd frequently. All
> was well again in Chicken Literary Land!
>
> But when he added that function-calls never return, Chicken Literary
> and friends lapsed into an existential stupor. And Henry the Fox ate
> them.
You handled the continuation very well, congratulations. Not a very
happy ending though. After (eat ...) I suppose the return value is
undefined, isn't it...
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), Elf, 2008/03/01
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), John Cowan, 2008/03/02
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), Elf, 2008/03/02
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/02
- chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Elf, 2008/03/02
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Shawn Rutledge, 2008/03/03
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/03
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)),
Shawn Rutledge <=
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Elf, 2008/03/03