Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code

[Felix Winkelmann]

From: Ivan Raikov <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:43:52 +0900

> 
>   Well, users of monadic programming languages would say that
> continuations are monads in disguise :-) And yes, monads are "just"
> statically typed continuations in a side-effect free environment, but
> my point was that implementing them in Chicken would be non-trivial,
> unless you had an elegant way to specify operational semantics.
> 

Sorry, I don't understand this. Unless you want lazyness, what would
be required in a suitable general dynamically typed language to 
implement monads?


cheers,
felix