Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?

[Jim Ursetto]

On 3/19/08, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Ursetto scripsit:
> > Does this mean fp is now GPL?

> Yes, it is, or rather it would be if the copy of silex.scm in the silex egg
> were under the GPL. But it is not; there is neither copyright nor license
> anywhere on it.  As I said before, it is "use at your own risk."

Good.  May I suggest then that the license on the silex egg be returned to its
previous status ("Other") and that, if we do need to incorporate GPLed code
from a newer version, a new egg be created.

If that isn't doable, I'll host a frozen version of the egg with the
original license.