[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Re: Anyone tried using datadraw with Chicken?
From: |
Aleksej Saushev |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Re: Anyone tried using datadraw with Chicken? |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:38:49 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) |
Matthew Welland <address@hidden> writes:
> Has anyone tried using datadraw (http://datadraw.sourceforge.net/) with
> Chicken? If so did any of the claimed performance benefits transfer to
> Chicken code? It almost seems like a scheme compiler or interpreter could
> be built on top of datadraw or coupled extremely close to it rather than
> moving data in and out of it but in any case an interface to chicken seems
> like it'd be really cool.
Any comparison to Berkeley DB? Or is just anouther incarnation of GPL NIH?
> I have some large chunks of data to munge and Chicken + sqlite3 is proving a
> bit slow (8-20 hour run times) and I'm considering rethinking my approach.
There's a trade between speed and persistency, you can't get both.
If you want speed more than persistency, you should just drop the latter,
use main-memory DB or even no DB at all, if you don't need query language
or sharing data between processes.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Chicken-users] Re: Anyone tried using datadraw with Chicken?,
Aleksej Saushev <=