[Chicken-users] Dual-format macros

[Tobia Conforto]

On 6 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> So far I've got (from watching the mailing list) the feeling that  
> define-macro and define-syntax don't play well together.
>
> If it was better to have both versions available, the define-macro  
> version for compatibility and define-syntax for the upcoming  
> hygienic chicken, then: how should this be handled?  Two eggs?


I've found this in the amb egg, it solves the problem nicely:

(cond-expand
  (hygienic-macros
    ;;put here a bunch of define-syntax + syntax-rules macros
    )
  (else
    ;;put here the same macros written in un-hygienic define-macro
    ))


Tobia