[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:52:41 +0200 |
There are IMHO more important things we should concentrate on. There's
still
a) a broken SRFI-34 egg - something easily ignored
b) a race condition in the scheduler (which's fix I meanwhile fixed wrt.
to multiple threads waiting for the same fd, though I would not expect
that to ever happen; but I got tired of reposting) - this one definately
needs to be handled by the scheduler; it's impossible to overwrite the
relevant part (at least if the doc's are right [hint]) and absolutely
necessary if you don't want your progs run havoc when a fd becomes
invalid for whatever reason.
c) Sometimes I get my app eating all memory just after a fork and before
I come to process-execute. Since I disabled interrupts in this section
already, I'm sort of lost. If someone had an idea what the hell that
one could possibly be...
Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2008, 06:55 -0700 schrieb Elf:
> > That's what I have been able to do bevor. That's not the aim. I need
> > to change all timeouts for all thread which are started after the
> > change.
>
> then all you have to do is use the environments egg to make or copy the
> base env before starting the server, and define an evaler to eval certain
> expressions in that environment rather than the local.
I'm not at all saying it can't be done without adding code to the
chicken core. In fact I'm working with a version, which does what I
need.
All I've been advocating where a few additional lines of code to support
an additional feature *without* workarounds, *sharing* almost all code
at the cost of one additional comparison of symbols.
I fact I'm using environments too, for evalers in special environments.
But I'd consider it an overkill in that context.
> if you would read the docs,
You've got the feeling I did not read docs nor code?
That's not the case.
And I'm not ready to arrive at personal insults for proposing what I
would consider an improvement. Still neither you nor anyone else has so
far shown it would cause any harm.
Best Regards
/Jörg
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 2008/08/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Tobia Conforto, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Tobia Conforto, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Graham Fawcett, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Graham Fawcett, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl,
F. Wittenberger <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Alex Queiroz, 2008/08/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 2008/08/19
Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Tobia Conforto, 2008/08/18