Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-98?

[felix winkelmann]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Even though "getenv" is more widespread, following the SRFI might be
>> the right way.
>
> Agreed.  Perhaps now is a good time to start thinking about some kind of
> system for ensuring backwards compat, to prevent cruft from accumulating?

What I usually do is deprecating the old API and making a note somewhere
to remove the deprecated piece of functionality one or two major releases
later. Would you suggest a particular sort of process?


cheers,
felix