Re: [Chicken-users] command-line-arguments

[F. Wittenberger]

Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Elf:
> i'd recommend the r5rs primitive 'write' instead of 'display', 'printf', etc,
> if you want the external representation of your code. :)

That's what would have recommended until a few weeks ago, when I found
"write" to be the source of an incompatibility between two Scheme
systems.

/Jörg

> 
> -elf
> 
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
> 
> > 2008/10/10 Peter Bex <address@hidden>:
> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
> >>>   (display (command-line-arguments))
> >>
> >> That's (kind of) a limitation of how 'display' works.
> >> #;1> (display (list "foo" "bar"))
> >> (foo bar)
> >>
> >> Instead, you want:
> >> #;2> (printf "~S" (list "foo" "bar"))
> >> ("foo" "bar")
> >
> > Thanks everyone!
> >
> > Note to self: "Don't rely on `display` to tell you what your code does."
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chi&#0;