Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?

[felix winkelmann]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I would keep these things in extensions, though. There is already too much
>> stuff in the core (I know I keep repeating this, but I'm really concerned 
>> about
>> it).
>
> I think Ivan is not suggesting _adding_ this to core, but rather
> _replacing_ what we have in core with this.  In total, this should
> have the net effect of adding nothing (though I don't know how big
> both libraries are).

The current stuff is relatively minimal, compared to the full filepath
library.


cheers,
felix