Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?

[Ivan Raikov]

  Actually, I think it would be nice to have a tool that can
automatically create a custom Chicken shared library that only
includes the units that user specifies, and perhaps that can also
statically link eggs to that library. For example, if I want to deploy
a standalone application that does not use the regex and tcp units,
but uses matchable and filepath, this hypothetical tool would be able
to create a Chicken library that includes statically compiled
syntax-case, matchable and filepath, but no regex or tcp units. What
do people think about this?

   -Ivan


Peter Bex <address@hidden> writes:

> I think Ivan is not suggesting _adding_ this to core, but rather
> _replacing_ what we have in core with this.  In total, this should
> have the net effect of adding nothing (though I don't know how big
> both libraries are).