[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:21:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
felix winkelmann scripsit:
> Note that crunch is highly experimental and incomplete. You requirements
> are tough, and you will not find many functional languages that don't require
> GC. Stalin and MLton come to mind (perhaps one can make GC at least
> unlikely, or reduce it to a minimum).
Stalin uses the Boehm conservative GC.
--
By Elbereth and Luthien the Fair, you shall address@hidden
have neither the Ring nor me! --Frodo http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
- [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Rick R, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Thomas Chust, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Tobia Conforto, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Rick R, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23