[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros
|
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
|
Subject: |
Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:32:25 -0500 |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> wrote:
> A situation not mentioned above where you may prefer something else,
> even if not breaking hygiene, is when your macro would be better off
> written in procedural style
Forgot to mention, pattern matching is available in explicit renaming macros
via the matchable extension; the foreigners egg is an example.
- [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jordan Cooper, 2009/04/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Thomas Chust, 2009/04/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, John Cowan, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, nefigah, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jim Ursetto, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros,
Jim Ursetto <=
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jordan Cooper, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, John Cowan, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jordan Cooper, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, John Cowan, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jim Ursetto, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, John Cowan, 2009/04/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Alex Shinn, 2009/04/22