Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos

[Glen Foy]

On Jul 25, 2009, at 7:04 PM, felix winkelmann wrote:

> Tinyclos has become much too complicated over the years. It ought to  
> be
> replaced by something cleaner. Any volunteers?

Hi,

I started an abbreviated CLOS a while back.  It had support for:

CLOS syntax
multiple inheritance
generic functions with standard method combination  
of :around :after :before and :primary methods
class slots and instance slots
initargs, initforms, default-initargs
automatically generated slot accessors

limitations:
no MOP
no dynamic class redefinitions

I'd be glad to try to whip this into shape, if that sounds like  
something that would be useful.  The name I choose was stolen from an  
old Rick Taube post  -->   COOPS,  Chicken Object Oriented Programming  
System   :-)

-- Glen

(I'm a CL hacker, so the code will probably need some refinement)


www.clairvaux.org