[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Advice on require, use, import, etc.
From: |
Sam Varner |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Advice on require, use, import, etc. |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:52:21 -0400 |
I'm confused about the different ways to load extensions. So brace
yourself for some newbie questions and feel free to state the obvious.
1. Should I prefer 'import' if it's available? E.g (import srfi-4)
instead of (use srfi-4).
2. Should I turn my own libraries into modules and 'import' instead
of 'require'?
3. With any of these methods, what do I need to do to make sure
that the macro definitions are properly loaded?
4. When should 'import-for-syntax' be used?
5. Do any of the answers to the questions above depend on whether
I'm compiling or interpreting?
6. Are there situations where other means (load, require-extension,
etc.) would be the way to go?
Thanks.
- [Chicken-users] Advice on require, use, import, etc.,
Sam Varner <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Advice on require, use, import, etc., John Cowan, 2009/08/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Advice on require, use, import, etc., Jim Ursetto, 2009/08/13