Re: [Chicken-users] syntax-case and Chicken 4.2.0

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

In one sense, this is good news!

A question: does the builtin syntax-rules accept the (... ...) syntax
that Dybvig's system does?  My code has some macros that expand to macro
definitions, the canonical case where nested ... is often necessary.  

(Or, alternatively, does it support some other method to avoid the ...
literal problem in this case?)

Thomas


On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:19 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Dan Liebgold scripsit:
> 
> > I probably have something obvious wrong, but after installing the
> > syntax-case egg in Chicken 4.2.0 I can't "require" it, and I can't make
> > sense of the error:
> 
> Chicken 4.x doesn't support the syntax-case egg or any other macrology egg.
> It now has built-in macros, and supports only explicit renaming and 
> syntax-rules.
>