[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] syntactically completeness / consistency
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] syntactically completeness / consistency |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:50:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
> With the most recent commits (4.4.4), chicken is now consistent in the
> way core forms are handled. There are no hard-coded special forms and
> everything can be redefined, reexported and modified on import. Syntax
> may now also expand into module forms (if at toplevel, local or nested
> modules are still not available and not strictly necessary).
>
> So, the transition to hygienic macros and a real module system is
> hereby complete, not taking into account the bugs that will still lurk
> everywhere and the low performance of the expander, which will be
> worked on.
Fantastic, Felix. Thanks a lot.
By the way, 4.4.4 runs the quickdoc.scm script in ~2.5s on the same
machine it takes ~7s with 4.4.0. I suppose that's the result of
"slightly better expansion performance" as mentioned in the NEWS
file. Just amazing!
Best wishes.
Mario