[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?
|
From: |
Jeronimo Pellegrini |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:11:25 -0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:41:36PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hi Jeronimo
Hi Mario!
> I'd suggest naming the egg in a way it doesn't sound as general as
> "faster I/O primitives". Maybe it's just me, but when I read "fast-io",
> I instinctively think that Chicken's I/O primitives are slow and by
> using fast-io I'll get faster I/O for any case. Again, it's only a
> suggestion, maybe it's just me.
Right!
What would be more appropriate?
"unsafe-io"
"fast-unsafe-io"
"unsafe-io-procedures"
"nonstandard-fst-io"
J.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?,
Jeronimo Pellegrini <=