| I looked at the patch already, the INSTALL_LIB_HOME should take precedence and is set by `make LIBDIR=/usr/lib64`, as you did in the .spec file. In other words this should work without a patch unless there is a problem with the build system.
So, please send full build output so we can review it, making sure to run `make distclean` beforehand.On Apr 13, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 04/12/2010 05:53 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote: Mixing works fine on Debian, on 64-bit Debian /usr/lib contains the native libraries and lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib, with lib32/ being a separate directory. This allows apps that expect plain /usr/lib to work normally.
What I'm not clear on is why this is requires a patch in the first place. You specified LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 in your .spec file, as far as I know this should dump all library files into /usr/lib64 not /usr/lib, and if it doesn't maybe there is a bug in the makefile? Can you clarify what happens when you build with LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 (after a make distclean of course).
Look at the patch. The pathc /usr/lib is coded into a scheme source file:csc.scm (define library-dir ! (prefix "" "lib" (if host-mode INSTALL_LIB_HOME TARGET_LIB_HOME)) )
|