[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] On eggs and their licensing
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] On eggs and their licensing |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:47:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:37:48AM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> > Graaah! I hate this, using GPL for essential functionality like message
> > digests. I already killed the GPL-tainted md5 code we had and replaced
> > it with a common public domain implementation. It shouldn't be hard to
> > find a similarly liberally licensed sha1 implementation. If nobody
> > beats me to it, I'll try to find some time for that in the weekend.
>
> I don't know much about the licensing stuff, but if the eggs can have
> their licenses changed, maybe the authors won't mind changing them upon
> request.
The problem is the same as with the MD5 implementation; the egg is just a
wrapper around some C code that was taken from the internet. It's the C
code that's under the GPL license.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth