[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken
From: |
Alejandro Forero Cuervo |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:39:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
> From: Alejandro Forero Cuervo <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken
> 4?
> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:22:54 +0200
>
> > I seem to recall that in Chicken 3, when an egg did not contain a
> > 'version' file, one would be created automatically with the current
> > version (based on the name of the subdirectory of the tags directory).
> > Is this functionality gone from Chicken 4? I just looked at my recent
> > eggs (format-compiler, format-compiler-base and embedded-test) and
> > they don't seem to have this file. It was convenient to save egg
> > authors from having to redundantly specify the name of the version.
> > Maybe we could reinstante this?
> >
>
> Use
>
> `(extension-name-and-version)' ==> (<name> <version>)
This wouldn't work. I'm talking about the setup script, where I used
to do:
(install-extension 'foo
...
`(...
(version ,(if (file-exists? "version")
(with-input-from-file "version" read)
"unknown"))))
This worked in Chicken 3 but in Chicken 4 all my eggs now have version
"unknown". The advantage of automatically bundling the 'version' file
with the name of the sub-directory of tags was that it removed the
burden of redundantly maintaining this information from the eggs'
authors.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
- [Chicken-users] Creating new types and their representation in the REPL, Jack Trades, 2010/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Creating new types and their representation in the REPL, Peter Bex, 2010/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Creating new types and their representation in the REPL, John Cowan, 2010/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Creating new types and their representation in the REPL, Thomas Chust, 2010/07/07
- [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2010/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4?, Felix, 2010/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4?,
Alejandro Forero Cuervo <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2010/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4?, Felix, 2010/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2010/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] 'version' file not being bundled in eggs in Chicken 4?, Felix, 2010/07/08
[Chicken-users] Re: Creating new types and their representation in the REPL, Jack Trades, 2010/07/09