[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] More on Packaging eggs
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] More on Packaging eggs |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:30:16 -0400 (EDT) |
From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] More on Packaging eggs
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:02:47 -0400
> Hi Jim
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:57:39 -0400 Jim Pryor <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I'm confused by some of the version numbering in the egg repo. I know
>> there's no uniform reporting of this in the metadata, but even allowing
>> for that, these two facts still confuse me.
>>
>> The peep egg has a tags/ directory. The latest tag is 0.2.2. However
>> installing peep v.0.2.2 then doing "chicken-status" reports peep at
>> version 0.3.
>>
>> The loop egg has a tags/ directory. The only tag is 0.2. However,
>> installing loop 0.2 then doing "chicken-status" reports loop at version
>> 1.2.
>
> Those are bugs. The version indicated by the .setup file doesn't match
> the one indicated by the tag directory.
>
My bad. Will fix. Sorry.
cheers,
felix
Re: [Chicken-users] More on Packaging eggs, Jim Pryor, 2010/09/29