[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 23:34:34 +0200 (CEST) |
From: Jim Ursetto <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly [Was: Re:
dev-snapshot 4.6.3]
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:00:05 -0500
> Why can't the compatibility code be included in the new irregex unit?
> In other words, the old procedure names and behavior could be
> deprecated but left in so that 1) we don't have to add a blob of
> compatibility code to every egg, and 2) eggs using the old irregex API
> would be compatible with all Chicken versions without rebuilding.
> It's not very nice to the end-user to just remove procedures without
> going through a deprecation phase.
That's a good idea. This code could be added to irregex.scm without
touching irregex-core.scm (the upstream code).
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] dev-snapshot 4.6.3, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly, Alex Shinn, 2010/10/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly, Peter Bex, 2010/10/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly, Jim Ursetto, 2010/10/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly, Alex Shinn, 2010/10/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly, Peter Bex, 2010/10/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly, Jim Ursetto, 2010/10/11