[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault
From: |
Alan Post |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:50:27 -0700 |
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:07:39AM -0500, Felix wrote:
> From: David Dreisigmeyer <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault
> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:44:11 -0500
>
> > It's i386. This ia a problem with Snow Leopard. Chicken wouldn't
> > compile otherwise, with an error for apply-hack.
> >
>
> Ugh. Apple isn't what it used to be anymore... Damn.
>
> Is there a way to detect the correct processor type on this thing?
>
It's apparently the unfriendly /usr/sbin/system_profiler. Attached
is the result of running '/usr/sbin/system_profiler -detailLevel mini',
which removes personal information from the output.
http://hintsforums.macworld.com/showthread.php?t=43422
I played around with 'arch', 'machine', and 'uname' and they all
reported i386 or worse.
-Alan
--
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi
system_profiler.txt
Description: Text document
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Felix, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault,
Alan Post <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Stephen Eilert, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Felix, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, David Dreisigmeyer, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Thomas Chust, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, John Cowan, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, David Dreisigmeyer, 2010/12/01