Re: [Chicken-users] "picky" scrutinizer mode

[Alan Post]

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 05:35:22AM -0500, Felix wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I have added "-picky" to the experimental branch (I haven't created a
> change request, since the impact is minimal and this feature is purely
> optional). When given, the scrutinizer warns about undefined branches
> in conditionals in tail-position of global procedures that do not
> perform a self-call.  The scrutinizer does no inter-procedural
> flow-analysis, so there is no warning for this situation for local
> procedures which are called in tail-position (which, if I understood
> correctly, is what Joerg would have liked most).
> 

Is there a (declare ...) syntax to mimic this command-line option?

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi