[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] coops
From: |
schugk |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] coops |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:39:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) |
Hi,
i am playing around with coops and have some problems with <list> and
<pair>. I know that are fixed in version 1.1 but i can download 1.0
only via chicken-install.
The next point is that the performance is not as good as expected. Are
there any tricks? For example i have a method 'satisfy' with 2
parameters. The first is specialized for some classes, the second is
always a list.
(define-methode (satisfy (p <link-p>) (e #t)) ...)
(define-methode (satisfy (p <type-p>) (e #t)) ...)
Is it better to specialize the second argument too or switch the order
of arguments?
Thank you in advance,
Sandro
- [Chicken-users] coops,
schugk <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Felix, 2011/01/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 2011/01/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Christian Kellermann, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Thomas Chust, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Christian Kellermann, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Felix, 2011/01/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, John Cowan, 2011/01/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Thomas Chust, 2011/01/19